In order to weigh Jennifer Lopez’s Oscar chances, Megan McLachlan rewinds to 31 years ago when a box office disappointment earned Jessica Lange her second Academy Award.
There are two things my social media algorithm has been showing me this week. One, a ton of Diane Keaton dedications (keep them coming!), and the other: justice for Jennifer Lopez.
My X feed has been teeming with J.Lo love for her work in Bill Condon’s Kiss of the Spider Woman. How-fucking-ever, it usually comes with a huge caveat: Too bad the movie bombed, and she can’t get nominated.
Yes, unfortunately, KOTSW didn’t even break a million at the box office last weekend, which is a huge blow to her awards chances and to politically relevant movie musicals continuing to get made (although how many politically relevant movie musicals are there, I suppose?).
Yet, there are a ton of unlikely Oscar success stories, and the first one that came to mind was Jessica Lange’s Best Actress win for 1994’s Blue Sky.
The Story of Jessica Lange’s Win for Blue Sky
Let’s go back to 1994 for a minute (break out your Starter jackets).
In fact, no: Let’s go further back to 1990 — because that’s when Blue Sky was filmed. The film sat on the shelf for 4 years after Orion Pictures went bankrupt. And then, director Tony Richardson passed away in 1991, which put a wrench in the film’s promotion.
When it was finally released after Orion reorganized, Blue Sky made a little under what KOTSW made at the box office in its opening weekend: $764,890 (of course, it was in 200 screens compared to KOTSW’s 1,300) on a budget of $16 million (adjusted for inflation today, approximately a little over $30 million — KOTSW’s budget).
Some film delays only help the hype (re: Titanic), but Blue Sky was never going to be a huge box office smash — kind of like KOTSW. As Nick Taylor writes at The Film Experience:
Blue Sky is not the hidden gem or the Lange showcase Country or Sweet Dreams indelibly provide. But it does have a jagged, engaging momentum to it, never quite settling into a stable formal or narrative rhythm despite its very middlebrow impressions.
When people talk about Jessica Lange’s resume, no one mentions Blue Sky. Even Tootsie gets more recognition — a film for which she won Best Supporting Actress. Blue Sky is more of the answer to an Oscar trivia question you get wrong.
So, Okay, What Does This Have To Do With Jennifer Lopez?
Okay, so back to J.Lo. A movie musical from 2025 and a domestic drama from 1994 don’t have a lot in common, but the awards situations they were released in might.
Best Supporting Actress is a weird bag this year. Let’s face it. Teyana Taylor could be a frontrunner, but she’s missing for a huge chunk of One Battle After Another. Amy Madigan is still in the conversation for a quirky horror thriller she appears in the back half of. Sentimental Value has two solid supporting performances from Elle Fanning and Inga Ibsdotter Lilleaas, with the edge given to Lilleaas. Ariana Grande will most likely get in, but what if there’s Wicked fatigue or that it doesn’t live up to first film (many have lamented that the second act is not as good as the first)?
Jennifer Lopez has two things going for her: consistency and an overdue narrative. She appears throughout KOTSW, beginning to end, and there might also be some voters still bitter she didn’t get in for Hustlers.
For Jessica Lange’s Blue Sky win, she was up against:
Jodie Foster, Nell
Miranda Richardson, Tom & Viv
Winona Ryder, Little Women
Susan Sarandon, The Client
Lange feels like an unlikely winner in this category, for a film whose sole nomination is hers. (Jodie Foster was also the sole nomination for Nell, but they weren’t going to give her a third Oscar so soon.)
Eddie Mouradian at Awards Watch gave an interesting breakdown of that Best Actress year, citing Lange as a default rather than an overdue narrative.
And maybe that’s how Jennifer Lopez will factor into this year’s conversation. She gives a classic Hollywood performance that the Academy typically loves, singing and dancing, when they might not want to award a revolutionary who abandons her family (men will cite she’s a bad mother when really she’s just a complicated person — I love Perfidia!), a witch who casts spells on a town, or Glenn Close, just because they like to torture that poor woman.
Bottom line: It’s Oscar season, and anything can happen. Let’s not let the Spider Woman kiss Lopez’s Oscar chances quite yet.









Is anyone surprised that this movie did not do well at the box office? What were people expecting? At this point, it's clear that this is just the environment we're in.
People complain about OBAA's BO performance. It did more than expected in my view. 148M worldwide is quite a big number for a non IP film.
That was informative and fun. Talk about one battle after another (Pun definitely intended) to get the big statue.
Speaking of Ms Lange, what happened to Long Day's Journey Into Night (2025)? I loved Mr Lumet's 1962 version and was looking forward to the new one, especially with some early 2025 Oscar talk for Ms Lange's chances but the film came and left so quietly. What happened?
I have been watching for that one as well. It quietly premiered at an Irish film festival last spring, and then no one has heard from it since. It seemed to get positive reviews. It was supposed to show at the Nantucket Film Festival, but I think it was quietly pulled. I'm not sure what's going on with it. It can't be THAT bad.
It really can't be.
Even if the film making isn't up to snuff, the cast alone demands more attention. Not even a whisper of digital release..
Best Picture (in alphabetical order):
Frankenstein, Guillermo del Toro – Netflix
Hamnet, Chloe Zhao – Focus Features
It Was Just an Accident, Jafar Panahi – Neon
Marty Supreme, Josh Safdie – A24
One Battle After Another, Paul Thomas Anderson – Warner Bros
Sentimental Value, Joachim Trier – Neon
Sinners, Ryan Coogler – Warner Bros
The Secret Agent, Kleber Mendonca Filho – Neon
The Testament of Ann Lee, Mona Fastvold – Searchlight
Wicked: For Good, Jon M. Chu – Universal
Best Director (in alphabetical order):
Paul Thomas Anderson, One Battle After Another
Kleber Mendonca Filho, The Secret Agent
Jafar Panahi, It Was Just an Accident
Josh Safdie, Marty Supreme
Chloe Zhao, Hamnet
Best Actress (in alphabetical order):
Jessie Buckley, Hamnet
Rose Byrne, If I Had Legs I'd Kick You
Laura Dern, Is This Thing On?
Renate Reinsve, Sentimental Value
Amanda Seyfried, The Testament of Ann Lee
Best Actor (in alphabetical order):
Will Arnett, Is This Thing On?
Timothee Chalamet, Marty Supreme
Leonardo DiCaprio, One Battle After Another
Ethan Hawke, Blue Moon
Wagner Moura, The Secret Agent
Best Supporting Actress (in alphabetical order):
Elle Fanning, Sentimental Value
Regina Hall, One Battle After Another
Jennifer Lopez, Kiss of The Spider Woman
Gwyneth Paltrow, Marty Supreme
Teyana Taylor, One Battle After Another
Best Supporting Actor (in alphabetical order):
Benicio Del Toro, One Battle After Another
Paul Mescal, Hamnet
Sean Penn, One Battle After Another
Adam Sandler, Jay Kelly
Stellan Skarsgard, Sentimental Value
Best Adapted Screenplay (in alphabetical order):
Bugonia
Hamnet
Frankenstein
One Battle After Another
Wake Up Dead Man
Best Original Screenplay (in alphabetical order):
It Was Just an Accident
Is This Thing On?
Marty Supreme
Sentimental Value
The Secret Agent
You believe Amy Madigan will be snubbed? I guess she´s a pretty safe nomination.
Besides, hope you are right about the sensei! 😉
Del Toro was sublime in the role – in my view. Madigan is in a genre film, and those usually get snubbed at Oscar turf.
I agree, I would prefer del Toro over Penn. In addition, I think he is also worthy of a nomination this year for The Phoenician Scheme (which won´t happen, but he´s still great in it).
Madigan stars in a genre film, yes, but her role is catchy and memorable – I´m pretty sure she will get nominated.
But when was the previous time that a role like that got an acting nomination with seemingly no support in any other category?
I do believe that, in principle, it is possible for a film to receive a single acting nomination (even though I am very poor at Oscar history and cannot say off the top of my head when this last happened). The prerequisite would be that the particular performance attracts enough attention and remains in the minds of the Oscar voters. A good showing at the upcoming precursor awards certainly won´t hurt. I think it's quite possible that Madigan could win a few awards or runner-up mentions from the prestigious critics' associations.
Beyond that, I'm not at all sure that Weapons couldn't get a second or third nomination: perhaps for original screenplay or a technical category?
I think Coogler and Jordan will both be in there.
Possible. Sinners will probably get 7-8 noms at the very least even with no acting/directing/screenplay.